| 数据搜索系统,热门电子元器件搜索 |
|
ADRF6516ACPZ-R7 数据表(PDF) 23 Page - Analog Devices |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ADRF6516ACPZ-R7 数据表(HTML) 23 Page - Analog Devices |
|
23 / 29 page ![]() Data Sheet ADRF6516 Rev. C | Page 23 of 29 EFFECT OF OUTPUT VOLTAGE LEVELS ON EVM Output voltage level can affect EVM greatly when the signal is compressed. When changing the output voltage levels of the ADRF6516, take care that the output signal is not in compres- sion, which causes EVM degradation. Figure 54 show EVM performance vs. RF input power for several maximum differential I and Q output voltage levels of 350 mV p-p up to 2.4 V p-p. For the lower maximum differ- ential output voltage levels, the EVM is less than −45 dB over approximately 20 dB of input power range. –50 –45 –40 –35 –30 –25 –20 –15 –10 –5 0 –25 –20 –15 –10 –5 0 5 RF INPUT POWER (dBm) 350mV p-p MAX 700mV p-p MAX 1500mV p-p MAX 2400mV p-p MAX Figure 54. EVM vs. RF Input Power at Several Output Maximum Differential Voltage Levels (Filter Corner = 10 MHz, OFDS Pulled High) For the largest tested maximum differential output voltage level of 2.4 V p-p, the ADRF6516 begins to compress the signal. This compression causes EVM to degrade, but it still remains below −40 dB, albeit over a truncated input power range. At the high end of the input power range, the signal is in full compression and EVM is large. Given that the gain is near its minimum, the input signal level must be lowered to bring the output signal out of full compression and into the proper linear operating region. EFFECT OF COFS VALUE ON EVM When enabled, the dc offset compensation loop effectively nulls any information below the high-pass corner set by the COFS capacitor. However, loss of the low frequency information of the modulated signal can degrade the EVM in some cases. As the signal bandwidth becomes larger, the percentage of information that is corrupted by the high-pass corner becomes smaller. In such cases, it is important to select a COFS capacitor that is large enough to minimize the high-pass corner frequency, which prevents loss of information and degraded EVM. Figure 55 shows degradation of the EVM vs. RF input power as the COFS capacitor value becomes smaller, which increases the high-pass corner for the dc offset compensation loop. –50 –45 –40 –35 –30 –25 –20 –15 –10 –5 0 –35 –30 –25 –20 –15 –10 –5 0 5 RF INPUT POWER (dBm) COFS = 1µF COFS = 220nF COFS = 1nF Figure 55. EVM vs. RF Input Power at Several COFS Values (Filter Corner = 10 MHz, 256-QAM, 14 MSPS Signal with α = 0.35; Output Differential Signal Level Held to 700 mV p-p; OFDS Pulled Low) Figure 56 shows the effect that COFS has on several modulated signal bandwidths. The modulated bandwidth was swept while using 1000 pF and 1 µF values for COFS. Total gain was set to 15 dB, so the high-pass filter corner of the 1000 pF capacitor is 26.67 kHz, and the high-pass filter corner of the 1 µF capacitor is 26.67 Hz. It is recommended that at moderate signal band- widths, a 1 µF capacitor for COFS be used to obtain the best EVM when using the dc offset compensation loop. –50 –45 –40 –35 –30 –25 –20 –15 –10 –5 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SIGNAL BANDWIDTH CORNER (MHz) COFS = 1µF COFS = 1000pF Figure 56. EVM vs. Signal Bandwidth Corner with COFS = 1 µF and COFS = 1000 pF (Filter Corner = 10 MHz) |
|
|
链接网址 |
| ALLDATASHEET是否为您带来帮助? [ DONATE ] |
关于 Alldatasheet | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 隐私政策 | 数据表链接 | 链接交换 | 制造商名单 All Rights Reserved©Alldatasheet.com |
| Russian : Alldatasheetru.com | Korean : Alldatasheet.co.kr | Spanish : Alldatasheet.es | French : Alldatasheet.fr | Italian : Alldatasheetit.com Portuguese : Alldatasheetpt.com | Polish : Alldatasheet.pl | Vietnamese : Alldatasheet.vn Indian : Alldatasheet.in | Mexican : Alldatasheet.com.mx | British : Alldatasheet.co.uk | New Zealand : Alldatasheet.co.nz |
|
Family Site : ic2ic.com |
icmetro.com |