| 数据搜索系统,热门电子元器件搜索 |
|
ADA4961ACPZN-R7 数据表(PDF) 21 Page - Analog Devices |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ADA4961ACPZN-R7 数据表(HTML) 21 Page - Analog Devices |
|
21 / 25 page ![]() ADA4961 Data Sheet Rev. A | Page 20 of 24 LOW-PASS ANTIALIAS FILTERING FOR THE ADC INTERFACE The high frequency distortion performance of the ADA4961 can be enhanced by adding a low-pass filter to the output (see Figure 46 and Figure 47. A two-pole low-pass filter is used in the ADC Driving section to illustrate the distortion improvement capabilities and integrated noise reduction. Figure 49 shows a simplified diagram of a two-pole low-pass (LP) filter. The inductor capacitance (LC) values are 2 nH and 2 pF, respectively. This filter gives an overall −3 dB BW of 2 GHz when connected to the ADA4961. Ideally, the BW is 3.5 GHz without any parasitics. The parasitic, C, (about 1 pF) across the 2 nH inductor (not shown) reduces the BW to about 2.1 GHz. Take care to ensure that the physical length of the filter is less than 1/10 the wavelength of the 3 dB corner frequency. At 2 GHz, it is 75 mm. The Series L (along with the internal bond wire inductance) and C parasitic parallel create a parallel resonance that causes a reduction in overall BW. Other values and filter types can be used depending on the end user requirements, but care is needed to ensure that the Circuit Q does not exceed 1. The values of 2 nH and 2 pF show the relative improvement in distortion (single tone and IMD3) vs. no filter at frequencies out to 1.5 GHz. At frequencies above about 600 MHz, the HD3s begin to attenuate as is expected due to the LP roll-off of the L (2 nH) and Shunt C (2 pF). In addition, the inband IMD3s also improve. This improvement is due to the peaking that results at the amplifier output due to its internal parasitics interacting with the 2 nH inductor and its Shunt C parasitic. This peaking reduces the input signal to the amplifier (not shown), thus reducing inband third-order terms. 20 15 10 5 0 –5 –10 –15 –25 1M 10M 100M FREQUENCY (MHz) 1G –20 NO FILTER FILTER Figure 45. Maximum Gain vs. Frequency, With and Without LC Filter –100 –95 –90 –85 –80 –75 –70 –60 –65 –55 –50 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 2000 1600 1800 FREQUENCY (MHz) WITH FILTER NO FILTER Figure 46. IMD vs. Frequency, With and Without LC Filter –100 –95 –90 –85 –80 –75 –70 –60 –65 –55 –50 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 2000 1600 1800 FREQUENCY (MHz) WITH FILTER NO FILTER Figure 47. HD2 vs. Frequency, With and Without LC Filter –100 –95 –90 –85 –80 –75 –70 –60 –65 –55 –50 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 2000 1600 1800 FREQUENCY (MHz) WITH FILTER NO FILTER Figure 48. HD3 vs. Frequency, With and Without LC Filter |
|
|
链接网址 |
| ALLDATASHEET是否为您带来帮助? [ DONATE ] |
关于 Alldatasheet | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 隐私政策 | 数据表链接 | 链接交换 | 制造商名单 All Rights Reserved©Alldatasheet.com |
| Russian : Alldatasheetru.com | Korean : Alldatasheet.co.kr | Spanish : Alldatasheet.es | French : Alldatasheet.fr | Italian : Alldatasheetit.com Portuguese : Alldatasheetpt.com | Polish : Alldatasheet.pl | Vietnamese : Alldatasheet.vn Indian : Alldatasheet.in | Mexican : Alldatasheet.com.mx | British : Alldatasheet.co.uk | New Zealand : Alldatasheet.co.nz |
|
Family Site : ic2ic.com |
icmetro.com |