| 数据搜索系统,热门电子元器件搜索 |
|
MCP3564-E/ST 数据表(PDF) 20 Page - Microchip Technology |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MCP3564-E/ST 数据表(HTML) 20 Page - Microchip Technology |
|
20 / 108 page ![]() MCP3561/2/4 DS20006181C-page 20 2019-2021 Microchip Technology Inc. 2.1 Noise Specifications Table 2-1 and Table 2-2 summarize the noise performance of the MCP3561/2/4 devices. The noise performance is an analog gain function of the ADC (digital gain does not change the noise performance significantly) and the OSR, chosen through the user interface. With a higher gain, the input referred noise is reduced. With a higher OSR setting, the noise is also reduced as the oversampling diminishes both thermal noise and quantization noise induced by the Delta-Sigma modulator loop. The noise value generally increases when temperature is higher as thermal noise is dominant for all OSR larger than 32. For high OSR settings (> 512), the thermal noise is largely dominant and increases proportionally to the square root of the absolute temperature. The performance in the following tables has been measured with AVDD = DVDD = VREF = 3.3V, and with the device placed in Continuous Conversion mode, with the differential input voltage equal to VIN = 0V, default conditions for the register map and MCLK = 4.9152 MHz. The noise performance is also a function of the measurement duration. For short duration measure- ments (low number of consecutive samples), the peak-to-peak noise is usually reduced because the crest factor (ratio between the RMS noise and peak-to-peak noise) is reduced. This is only a conse- quence of the noise distribution being Gaussian by nature (see Figure 2-3 for noise histogram example and fitting with an ideal Gaussian distribution). The noise specifications have been measured with a sample size of 16384 samples for low OSR values and have been capped to approximately 80 seconds for the 16384 samples leading to a larger duration. The noise specifications are expressed in two different values, which lead to the same quantity. It may be more practi- cal to choose one of these representations depending on the desired application. In Table 2-1, the RMS (Root Mean Square) noise is the variance of the ADC output code, expressed in µVRMS and input referred with Equation 5-5. The peak-to-peak noise values are in parentheses. The peak-to-peak noise is the difference between the maximum and minimum code observed during the complete time of the measurement (see Equation 5-5). In Table 2-2, the noise is expressed in Effective Resolution (ER). The Effective Resolution is a ratio of the full-scale range of the ADC (that depends on VREF and gain) and the noise performance of the device. The Effective Resolution can be determined from the RMS or peak-to-peak noise with the following equations. EQUATION 2-1: EQUATION 2-2: Due to the nature of the noise, the performance detailed in the noise tables can vary significantly from one measurement to another. They present an averag- ing of the performance over a large distribution of parts over multiple lots. They give the typical expectation of the noise performance, but performance can be better or worse if a limited number of measurements is per- formed. For large gain and OSR combinations, if the noise performance is comparable to the quantization step (1 LSb), the performance is limited to 0.5 LSb for the RMS noise and 1 LSb for the peak-to-peak noise (same limits for Effective Resolution values). These figures correspond to the resolution limit of the device as peak-to-peak noise cannot be better than 1 LSb. Similarly, if the intrinsic RMS noise of the device is much smaller than 0.5 LSb, it may lead to histogram with either one or two bins, depending on the relative position of the input voltage versus the possible quan- tized outputs of the ADC. If the position is exactly in between two quantization steps, the histogram of output noise will have two bins with exactly 50% occur- rence on each. This case gives an RMS noise of a 0.5 LSb value, which is therefore, used as a cap of the performance for the sake of clarity and a better representation on the noise tables. The noise specifications are improved by a ratio of approximately √2 (or 0.5-bit Effective Resolution) when the AZ_MUX setting is enabled. However, the output data rate is significantly reduced (see Figure 5-5 and Table 5-6). The digital gain added for Gain = 32x and 64x settings is not significant for the noise performance, and there- fore, the noise values can be extracted from the Gain = 16x columns. Effective Resolution performance is degraded by one bit for Gain = 32x and two bits for Gain = 64x compared to Gain = 16x performance. ERRMS 2VREF GAIN RMS (Noise) ----------------------------------------------------- ln 2 ln ---------------------------------------------------------------- = ERpk pk – 2VREF GAIN Peak-to-Peak Noise ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ln 2 ln --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- = |
|
链接网址 |
| ALLDATASHEET是否为您带来帮助? [ DONATE ] |
关于 Alldatasheet | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 隐私政策 | 数据表链接 | 链接交换 | 制造商名单 All Rights Reserved©Alldatasheet.com |
| Russian : Alldatasheetru.com | Korean : Alldatasheet.co.kr | Spanish : Alldatasheet.es | French : Alldatasheet.fr | Italian : Alldatasheetit.com Portuguese : Alldatasheetpt.com | Polish : Alldatasheet.pl | Vietnamese : Alldatasheet.vn Indian : Alldatasheet.in | Mexican : Alldatasheet.com.mx | British : Alldatasheet.co.uk | New Zealand : Alldatasheet.co.nz |
|
Family Site : ic2ic.com |
icmetro.com |